“People who put a woman in charge will not succeed.”
In a book [Social Psychology | David Myers] He details the differences between male and female temperaments in leadership positions and how men are self-equipped to be leaders while women will only succeed in a system such as a transformative democracy that distributes roles in which they do not have a firm say. As it was said, “women demand political equality when the revolution is over,” meaning in times of war and conflict you will not find a woman who wants to lead [and we have to dilute conversations for her satisfaction] in times of prosperity she seeks her knowing the poor quality of the role.
________
“Men’s style of communication supports their social power. In situations where positions are not strictly defined, men tend to be more autocratic and women more democratic when distributing tasks.
In leadership positions, men stand out as directive, task-oriented leaders (as opposed to people-focused, people-first), while women stand out for “transformational” leadership, which is increasingly favored by organizations, as well as motivational and social skills that build team spirit.
Men, more than women, emphasize the primacy of victory, progress and dominance over others, which may explain why people prefer a male leader for inter-group competition, such as when countries go to war, rather than a male leader when intra-group conflict occurs.
Men are also more impulsive and take more risks. One study of 35,000 stockbroker accounts found that “men are more overconfident than women,” and thus were 45% more likely to trade stocks. In conversations, men’s style reflects their interests in autonomy, while women’s style reflects their interests in communication/association.
Men are more inclined to talk like strong people do.”
Excerpted from the Muslim Non-Modernist page
